Astra Zeneca clinical trial data review

Source

Assessment report

29 January 2021 EMA/94907/2021 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP)

COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca

Common name: COVID-19 Vaccine (ChAdOx1-S [recombinant])

Placebo

Brazil, UK: MenACWY (meningococcal group a, c, w-135, and y conjugate vaccine)

South Africa: Saline

Efficacy

Prevention, against hospitalization, against serious disease and death

Abbreviations: CI = Confidence Interval; ICU = Intensive Care Unit; NE = Not Evaluable; VE = Vaccine Efficacy. Source: Supplemental Tables IEMT 207.1, IEMT 207.2, IEMT 207.3, IEMT 207.4, IEMT 207.5.

COVID-19 events are adjudicated events based on virologically- confirmed results from RT-PCR or other nucleic acid amplification test. The 4 to 12 weeks dosing interval range corresponds to ≥ 28 days to ≤ 84 days.

Table 1 Source: Vaccine Efficacy for Incidence of First SARS-CoV-2 Virologically-confirmed COVID-19
Occurring ≥15 Days Post Second Dose in the Pooled Analysis Set (COV002 + COV003), DCO2 (07
December 2020)

COVID19: VE of AZD1222 versus control, the 95% CI and p value were estimated based on Poisson regression with robust variance including the term of study code, treatment, age group at screening (18-55 years, 56-69 years, and >=70 years) as covariates as well as the log of the follow-up time as an offset.

Hospitalization: The maximum likelihood estimate of VE of AZD1222 versus control, the exact 95% CI (or 97.5% onesided) and p value were estimated based on stratified Poisson regression with Exact Conditional Method including treatment as factor, study code and age group at screening (18-55 years, 56-69 years, and >=70 years) as strata factors as well as the log of total number of participants for each combination of treatment and strata VE is defined as 1-(incidence from the AZD1222 arm / incidence from the control arm) expressed as a percentage, where the risk ratio is derived from Poisson regression with robust variance.

Efficacy against hospitalization

1-(hospitalization incidence from the AZD1222 arm / hospitalization incidence from the control arm) expressed as a percentage,

(1- (0/0.15)) = 100%

Vaccine Efficacy

The 95% CI for the VE is obtained by taking 1 minus the 95% CI of the risk ratio derived from the model. The observation period for the endpoint was 15 days post second dose up to 1 year in study.

Table2: result and analysis from : Summary of Efficacy for the pooled analysis from trials COV002 and COV003 (SD/SD
efficacy set, interval between doses 4-12 weeks)
Table2: result and analysis from : Summary of Efficacy for the pooled analysis from trials COV002 and COV003 (SD/SD
efficacy set, interval between doses 4-12 weeks)
Source: Discussion on clinical efficacy

Benefits

Preventing Covid-19

Base on positive on PCR test with primary symptoms (similar to a common cold) from incidences of 2,96 % (154⁄5210) in the placebo group versus 1.22% (64⁄5258 individuals) in the inoculated arm.

Preventing hospitalization

Based hospitalization incidence of 0.15 % (8⁄5210 individuals) in the placebo group versus o incidence in the inoculated arm

Preventing Severe disease

Cannot be assessed (Not applicable due to low incidence)

Preventing ICU

Cannot be assessed ( Not applicable due to low incidence)

Preventing death

Cannot ne assessed (Not applicable due to low incidence)

Safety

Risk assessment through incidences of adverse events.

Adversity

Adversity is calculated as 1-(AE incidence from the control arm / AE incidence from the AZD1222 arm) expressed as a percentage.

Incidence values: N values of the adverse event were used instead of actual incidence since the N value for the AZD122 arm is almost equal to the N values of the control arm.

We set the threshold of incidence to less than 0.1%:  Adversity for Adverse event with incidence of less than 0.1% is insignificant.

AZD1222 Inoculated N=12021Control N=11724Adversity %
Participants with any investigational product Related Unsolicited AE3570217239.16
*System organ class uncoded*654235.38
Infections and infestations68702.94
Blood and lymphatic system disorders28280.00
Immune system disorders3166.67
Metabolism and nutrition disorders301356.67
Psychiatric disorders281450.00
Nervous system disorders111764442.35
Eye disorders321940.63
Ear and labyrinth disorders818125.00
Cardiac Disorders13376.92
Vascular disorders34325.88
Respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders1281215.47
Gastrointestinal disorders32318443.03
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1187338.14
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders108144858.56
Renal and urinary disorders3233.33
Reproductive system and breast disorders5420.00
General disorders and administration site conditions2813150546.50
Investigations963167.71
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications11109.09
Table1: Adversity calculated for Investigational Product (AZD1222 ) Related Unsolicited Adverse Events by System Organ Class (Any
Dose for Safety Analysis Set

The risks

Mostly adverse in terms of:

Cardiac Disorders (76.92%)

Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (58.56%)

Metabolism and nutrition disorders (56.76%)

Psychiatric disorders (50%)

Uncertainties and limitations about unfavorable effects

Citations of main limitations

1

Long-term safety is considered a missing information in the Safety specification in the RMP, and will be characterised as part of the continuation of the pivotal clinical trial, other trials and a PASS.

2-

Safety data in participants with severe immunodeficiency, or participants with severe underlying disease
(including autoimmune or inflammatory disorders) are lacking, as all these populations were excluded from
the studies. The safety of AZD1222 in immunocompromised subjects will be evaluated post-authorization.

3-

Further, there is only very limited clinical experience in pregnant women, with 14 pregnant women in the
safety database who were exposed to AZD1222. Data from non-clinical studies do not indicate any harm
during pregnancy.
* In the absence of clinical data to confirm lack of risks, risks during pregnancy remain,
albeit theoretical.

*there is no indication about the source of this affirmation; what non-clinical studies are they referring to?

Conclusion

It is questionable weather the benefit outweighs the risk since, to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection with primary symptoms, like the common cold (100% efficacy) and possible hospitalization, one would take the risk of adversity in terms of cardiac disorders ( 76.92% ), musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (58.56% adversity ), metabolism and nutrition disorders (56.76% a) and psychiatric disorders (50%). Additionally, individuals with severe immunodeficiency, or with severe underlying disease (including autoimmune or inflammatory disorders) were excluded from the trial and a insignificant number of pregnant women in the database who were exposed to AZD1222. For these demographics, safety data are missing; safety and risks remain albeit theoretical. Overall, there is no telling what the future holds, these results being based on short-term clinical trial data.