Draw backs

Mind-Body-Soul. This balance is, for many, the secret to happiness, to a fulfilled life. Many religions base their principles around this balance. Some call it Nirvana, others sanctity, or bodhisattva. The Body is for many the sacred temple for the Soul. The Soul being the innate connectivity to the unseen, to spirituality, to others and to God/Universe. The Mind is like the director ( The Maestro). 

This triumvirate, this interconnected triad is what set us apart from the animal world. This balance and respect of the powers given to each is very important, and is ultimately the overall balance in Humanity.

What we have seen in the Covid-19 crisis management is that all the emphasis was put on the Body. On preserving the Body, keeping the Body alive even if sometimes it meant sacrificing the Mind and the Soul in the process. To keep elderlies alive, they were cut from their families, from their human connection. Sacrificing their mental health, (Mind) removing their dignity during the last chapters of their lives (Soul). To preserve the Body, newborns were separated from their mothers without any physical contact in the crucial early days of their lives, creating anxiety (Mind) and impacting the newborn’s early connectivity (Soul). 

The overall crisis management consisting of lockdown and social distancing without addressing their impact on the mind and soul, is one of the many examples of overextending the importance of the Body over the importance of the Mind and Soul. Groceries and Shopping malls (Body) were open while holistic centers and gym (Mind)  and places of worship (Soul) were closed.

Whenever a big project is in the making, consultations are performed in order to address the many possible impacts the project may have. In the case of the pandemic response, there seemed to have been little to no consultation in regards to the impact of each measure on the Mind or Soul of the population. In regards to the experimental vaccines that are being rolled out, the same absence of consultation seems to be going on. Worst any questioning is banned. Nevertheless there are drawbacks.

Waiver of liability

Immunity from liability is granted to the companies involved in manufacturing any Covid – 19 candidate vaccine.

Anyone injured via an injection against SARS-Cov-2, has no recourse against the manufacturer nor against any participant in the immunization act.

The Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), Alex M. Azar III, has granted the companies selling and those involved in virtually any other activity related to any COVID-19 vaccine immunity from liability for any injuries caused by these products. Prior to his current position, Secretary Azar was a senior executive for a major pharmaceutical company, Eli Lilly and Company, from 2007 to 2017.

Secretary Azar has issued a “Declaration pursuant to section 319F-3 of the Public Health Service Act to provide liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID-19.” (85 FR 15198.) It provides that those that “prescribe, administer, deliver, distribute or dispense” and the “manufacturers [and] distributors” of “any vaccine, used to treat, … prevent or mitigate COVID-19” shall enjoy “[l]iablity immunity ,” including, “from suit and liability under Federal and State law with respect to all claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a [COVID-19 vaccine].” (Id.; 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d.)

An integral driver of consumer safety is the potential and actual liability companies face if their product causes harm. To assure consumers that a pharmaceutical company stands behind the safety of its vaccine product, ICAN makes a public request that each pharmaceutical company formally declaration that it waives the immunity from liability granted by HHS for injuries caused by COVID-19 vaccine.

Waiving this immunity will provide the standard and minimal level of product safety assurance consumers expect. If a company will not bear the risk of having to pay for injuries caused by its product, it should be understandable that consumers will not want to bear the risk of being injected with that product.

The following a list of the pharmaceutical companies that have, to-date, publicly announced that they will stand-behind their product and waive immunity from liability for injuries caused by their COVID-19 vaccine: NONE.

Covid-19 vaccines: ethical, legal and practical considerations

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Code-of-Ethic-behaviors.jpg
Covid-19 vaccines: ethical, legal and practical considerations

The council of Europe parliamentary assembly held an Assembly debate on 27 January 2021 (5th Sitting) (see Doc. 15212, report of the Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development, rapporteur: Ms Jennifer De Temmerman). Text adopted by the Assembly on 27 January 2021 (5th Sitting).

Below are the main consideration brought to light about the covid-19 vaccines.

With respect to the development of the Covid-19 vaccines

7.1.1 ensure high-quality trials that are sound and conducted in an ethical manner in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (ETS No. 164, Oviedo Convention) and its Additional Protocol concerning Biomedical Research (CETS No. 195), and which progressively include children, pregnant women and nursing mothers;
7.1.2 ensure that regulatory bodies in charge of assessing and authorizing vaccines against Covid-19 are independent and protected from political pressure;
7.1.3 ensure that relevant minimum standards of safety, efficacy and quality of vaccines are upheld;
7.1.4 implement effective systems for monitoring the vaccines and their safety following their roll-out to the general population, also with a view to monitoring their long-term effects;
7.1.5 put in place independent vaccine compensation programmes to ensure compensation for undue damage and harm resulting from vaccination;
7.1.6 pay special attention to possible insider trading by pharmaceutical executives or pharmaceutical companies unduly enriching themselves at public expense, by implementing the recommendations contained in Resolution 2071 (2015) “Public health and the interests of the pharmaceutical industry: how to guarantee the primacy of public health interests?”;
7.1.7 overcome the barriers and restrictions arising from patents and intellectual property rights in order to ensure the widespread production and distribution of vaccines in all countries and to all citizens;

With respect to Covid-19 vaccination for children:

7.4.1 ensure a balance between the rapid development of vaccination for children and duly addressing safety and efficacy concerns and ensuring the complete safety and efficacy of all vaccines made available to children, with a focus on the best interests of the child, in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child;
7.4.2 ensure high-quality trials, with due care for relevant safeguards, in accordance with international legal standards and guidance, including a fair distribution of the benefits and risks for the children who are studied;
7.4.3 ensure that the wishes of children are duly taken into account, in accordance with their age and maturity; where a child’s consent cannot be given, ensure that agreement is provided in other forms and that it is based on reliable and age-appropriate information;
7.4.4 support the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) in its efforts to deliver vaccines from manufacturers that have agreements with the COVAX Facility to those who need them most;

With respect to ensuring the monitoring of the long-term effects of Covid-19 vaccines and their safety

7.5.1 ensure international co-operation for timely detection and elucidation of any safety signals by means of real-time global data exchange on adverse events following immunisation (AEFIs);
7.5.2 use vaccination certificates only for their designated purpose of monitoring vaccine efficacy, potential side effects and adverse events;
7.5.3 eliminate any gaps in communication between local, regional and international public health authorities handling AEFI data and overcome weaknesses in existing health data networks;
7.5.4 bring pharmacovigilance closer to healthcare systems;
7.5.5 support the emerging field of “adversomics” research, which studies inter-individual variations in vaccine responses based on differences in innate immunity, microbiomes and immunogenetics.

With respect to ensuring a high vaccine uptake

7.3.1 ensure that citizens are informed that the vaccination is not mandatory and that no one is under political, social or other pressure to be vaccinated if they do not wish to do so;
7.3.2 ensure that no one is discriminated against for not having been vaccinated, due to possible health risks or not wanting to be vaccinated;
7.3.3 take early effective measures to counter misinformation, disinformation and hesitancy regarding Covid-19 vaccines;
7.3.4 distribute transparent information on the safety and possible side effects of vaccines, working with and regulating social media platforms to prevent the spread of misinformation;
7.3.5 communicate transparently the contents of contracts with vaccine producers and make them publicly available for parliamentary and public scrutiny;

Breach of homeostasis

Nothing foreign should enter the cell if not to repair some alteration due to illness. Anything entering an otherwise healthy and balanced cell has the potential to disrupt this natural balance at different levels. These vaccine candidates are injected intramuscularly in the deltoid region, close to the lymph node. One cannot ignore that there is no cell specification in this new immuno-stimulating gene-based technology. The genetic nanoparticles can enter any cell along its way and disrupt its normal function, braking the precious homeostasis. The reaction (cellular or systemic) towards this invasion can be as diverse as the many types of cells the human body is composed of.

The new gene based technology bypasses all the natural defenses like trojan horse invasion. This can trigger a response contrary to what was expected, because the body, organs, cells, will try everything to return to an homeostasis state.

Remember the segment about the cell?

In a blood cell the foreign genetic particles and resulting spike proteins can modify the natural shape/density ratio preventing the cell from smoothly flowing in circulation, resulting in blood clots, embolism etc.

In a nerve cell, the presence of foreign genetic particles, followed by the production of the spike proteins can prevent the proper conduction of the message resulting in different neurological disorders.

The injection taking place close to the lymph node, we have to wonder… What will happen if the transfected cell turns out to be an immune cell ? A T cell? A B-cell? Those cells, meant to protect you from external threats, will be busy producing the foreign spike protein. You will now become vulnerable to infections, illness and diseases.

Critical thinking

Questions still remain… The genetic material (mRNA or DNA from vaccine candidate) should be eliminated once read, but how about the chemical nanoparticles used as carrier? How is it eliminated and how long does it take to do so? How about the spike protein produced by the body? Is it ever eliminated? Is it expelled from the cell into the circulation ? Could it be detected? If it causes damage is there a counter measure protocols? An antidote? Does it stay on the cell surface of its producing cell? Could this situation render the producing cell a target of the body’s immune response resulting in a cascade of autoimmune events? Could this trigger autoimmune diseases? What if the spike protein by itself is pathogenic? This could trigger some  major disruption of  cellular function or of systemic function causing great damage  and even death in otherwise healthy individuals. 

The foreign genetic may act as would a crazy disruptive individual;

Gene based vaccine candidates… major disruptors?
Vaccine associated enhanced disease

Evaluation of adverse events following immunization is very important also due the possibility of a particular clinical event named vaccine associated enhanced disease (VAED).

Vaccine-associated enhanced disease: Case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data

..Vaccine-associated enhanced diseases (VAED) are modified presentations of clinical infections affecting individuals exposed to a wild-type pathogen after having received a prior vaccination for the same pathogen [1]. Vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory (VAERD) disease refers to disease with predominant involvement of the lower respiratory tract. Classic examples of VAED are atypical measles and enhanced respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) occurring after administration of inactivated vaccine for these pathogens. In this situation, severe disease has been documented resulting from infection in individuals primed with non-protective immune responses against the respective wild-type viruses [2][3][4][5][6]. Given that these enhanced responses are triggered by failed attempts to control the infecting virus, VAED typically presents with symptoms related to the target organ of the infection pathogen. In order to recognize vaccine associated disease enhancement, it is therefore necessary to have a clear understanding of the clinical presentation and usual course of the natural disease.
Disease enhancement independent of vaccine priming has also been described for pathogens causing sequential infections with different cross-reactive but not cross-protective serotypes, including dengue and pandemic influenza [7][8][9][10][11][12]. …

The vaccine rollout of the new technology of vaccine candidate being performed while the related virus (SARS-Cov-2) is still circulating in the population, can be a serious  concern. The medical professionals involved in the treatment of patients presenting with symptoms occurring after the immunization should be aware of this phenomenon and should be trained in their management. Unfortunately, one of the drawbacks of this mass distribution of an experimental vaccine is that the general population (medical professionals included) will tend to be complacent or downplay the clinical manifestation due to invalid comparison or correlation to previous traditional vaccines. Whereas they should be on high alert; for, neither for short term nor long term, there are absolutely no comparable…

Toxicity of the spike protein

The spike protein was selected as priming antigen for most of the vaccine candidates. The general assumption was that the spike protein is an innocent, inoffensive  component of the SARS-Cov-2 virus.

Recent reports stipulate otherwise.

The COVID-19 spike protein may be a potentially unsafe toxic endothelial pathogen

..Suzuki (2021) examined SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein’s capacity to elicit cell signaling in human host cells and the implications for possible consequences of COVID-19 vaccines. They cautioned that while the aim is for the vaccines to para “introduce the spike protein into our body to elicit virus-neutralizing antibodies…we note that human host cells sensitively respond to the spike protein to elicit cell signaling…it is important to be aware that the spike protein produced by the new COVID-19 vaccines may also affect the host cells”. 
Zhang (2020) examined SARS-CoV-2 binding to platelet ACE 2 and the role in enhancing thrombosis (blood clotting) in COVID-19. They used platelets from healthy volunteers, non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 patients, including wild-type and hACE2 transgenic mice. They reported a different function of SARS-CoV-2 “on platelet activation via binding of Spike to ACE 2”. They reported that SARS-CoV-2-induced platelet activation “may participate in thrombus formation and inflammatory responses in COVID-19 patients”.
Similarly, Lei et. al. (2021) also reported that pseudovirus contributed to inflammation and damage in both the arteries and lungs of mice exposed intratracheally. They “exposed healthy human endothelial cells to the same pseudovirus particles. Binding of these particles to endothelial ACE 2 receptors led to mitochondrial damage and fragmentation in those endothelial cells, leading to the characteristic pathological changes in the associated tissue”. This research raised the very serious prospect that the spike protein on its very own, without the rest of the virus and the genome, can cause endothelial damage “associated with COVID-19”.

We are thus calling on regulatory agencies for safety information that could tell us:
i) “which cells are actually involved in the production of the spike protein, seeing that Pfizer’s own study submitted to the Japanese authorities shows the deposition of vaccine nanoparticles in various tissues and organs
ii) whether the spike protein is gaining access to the circulatory system and, if so, for how long; 
iii) whether the spike protein crosses the blood-brain barrier; 
iv) whether the spike protein interferes with semen production or ovulation, 
v) whether the spike protein crosses the placenta and impacts a developing baby, or 
vi) whether the spike protein is excreted in the milk of lactating mothers”. 
“The same information is needed for the S1 subunit of the spike protein, which is the part that binds to ACE2 receptors; and which has also been detected in the plasma of individuals following mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccination (Ogata et al., 2021)”.
Roll out based on preliminary results, no long term data

Note: we don’t have to date any information regarding long term effects of vaccination; cancer, autoimmune disorder,  teratogenicity etc.

Knowing the diversity, complexity, specifications of a human cell, one has to admit impact on this new technology of vaccine can be devastating. Before going through this experiment, you need to be aware of the possible side effects. Unfortunately, the vaccine rollout was initiated base solely on preliminary results from early concomitant clinical trials. Therefore long term side effects are unknown and must not be extrapolated from known effect of previous vaccines. Using traditional types of vaccines as comparable is a huge oversight, like comparing apples with bananas. Gene base vaccine is one of a kind , totally different ball game, which make reporting is one very important way to see the pattern and possible link to the vaccine. Alarming report  from Israel, leader in terms of the cov- vaccination rollout, is giving good insight to diverse clinical manifestations and their possible link to the experimental vaccines.

The other possible way to make this crucial link, is to have a comparable non-vaccinated population.  Like in any clinical trial, the control group is most important as it gives a comparable in terms of health,  morbidity and mortality. In this case the non-vaccinated population is the only placebo thus the importance to respect this choice.

Elimination of the placebo group

“Long-term follow-up of clinical trial participants to monitor for conditions such as cancer and autoimmune diseases will become difficult, if not impossible, if the vaccine makers hasten to offer their vaccines to the placebo groups. If this occurs, it will completely erase the ability of researchers to compare or evaluate potential long-term differences in health outcomes among the vaccinated and placebo groups. 

Pfizer and Moderna company executives have both suggested that the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial participants who received a placebo should be vaccinated.

Pfizer-BioNTech officials have already stated that they will begin offering the vaccine to placebo recipients by March 1, 2021, which is several months earlier than what they had originally planned for. By mid- January 2021, Moderna had already begun offering the vaccine to some placebo group participants.”

The conclusion from this turn of event i.e giving the “injection” to the placebo group further invalidates the clinical trial, thus the great importance to respect those who wish  not to be vaccinated; they are now the only comparable.

Finality of the injection

Once injected with any of the current experimental vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus, the deed cannot be undone. Regardless of what the consequences may be. We can observe, with various reports in the VAERS database, that the medical professionals are in the dark on how to repair some of the most serious adverse events resulting from these injections.  The solution or treatment mainly addressed the symptoms without offering a final ‘’cure’’. Therefore it is wise to Proceed With Caution.

Can we legally be coerced or imposed an EUA vaccine candidate?

This is a very important question and you must research the answer for yourself.

Perform a web search using duckduckgo.com : Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring vaccination with a Covid-19 vaccine distributed under an EUA

Perform a web search using duckduckgo.com : Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring vaccination with a Covid-19 vaccine distributed under an EUA.

Take note of your findings and conclusions. Most importantly knowing what you know now, should it be?

Questioning the massive rollout

Nuremberg was instrumental in the advancement of  accountability and justice. This unprecedented post WWI call for justice brought dignity to individuals taking part in clinical trials. The many laws and regulations which emerged from relentless activism knitted a  safety net protecting the individuals rights from undue monetary, societal, scientific gain.

What is the purpose of regulation if the standard of such regulation is lowered as seen fit?

Within the last year, the pandemic was utilized to lower the bar of what is expected in terms of regulatory compliance, which were established in the course of the last century. The same goes for laws and ethics. Questions should arise into people’s mind, without being silenced;

How were the concerns with respect to the development of the covid-19 vaccines, addressed and solved? In less than a year, a vaccine candidate, using a brand new technology in the field of vaccinology, was deemed ready to be injected into human arms. 

How were the concerns with respect to Covid-19 vaccination of children, addressed and solved? Children were recruited for clinical trials, only a few months after the first injection into adult arms. The clinical trials for the children lasted two months before the vaccine candidate from Pfizer was deemed suitable to be injected into children’s arms.

How were the concerns with respect to ensuring the monitoring of the long-term effects of Covid-19 vaccines and their safety, addressed and solved? There is no promotion of reporting symptoms. Most of the actors involved in the medical community are reluctant to link medical events to a vaccine candidate involvement. People reporting serious adverse events are not acknowledged in their concerns and are left to fend for themselves in their predicament. When the serious event arises more than a month after the injection the individual is faced with dismissive behavior whereas we don’t know anything about the new technology of vaccines, anything about long term effects. The medical community seems unaware of even the vast array of possibilities, nor of the way to manage the victims of  Covid-19 candidate vaccine injuries.

How were the concerns with respect to ensuring a high vaccine uptake, addressed and solved? Less than a year after the first injection of the vaccine candidate, there are serious talks about passports and mandates. Individuals are coerced and threatened to be injected. They are shunted and shamed when voicing their concerns about being injected. They are labelled ‘’ vaccine hesitancy victims’’, ‘’ Conspirationists’’, ‘’ Irresponsible’’, ‘’ Dangerous’’.

Those solutions addressing  the previous serious concerns are yet to be seen. One quick and simple solution would be to lift the liability waiver, forcing the manufacturing companies to insure the thorough safety of their product.  Instead,  congress is working on modernizing the vaccine injury compensation act. Through  The Vaccine Injury Compensation Modernization Act,

Silencing the voices of these individuals injured by vaccines amounts to erasing all the lessons learned, all the hard activism, all the suffering,  resetting the clock back to dark alley apothecary times.

Doctor Talks Episode 11: Dr. Julie Ponesse, PhD. Department of Philosophy